Inclusify vs accessiBe
Know what is broken, and keep the receipts
accessiBe adjusts your pages in the visitor's browser. Inclusify audits the rendered page with axe-core and keeps a dated record of what changed.
Published by Inclusify, one of the two products compared. How this comparison is built. Last checked August 2026.
Where Inclusify fits
Inclusify is built for teams who want the failures found, named and tracked. Here is what that fits, and the two cases where accessiBe is the better call.
- 4 fit Inclusify
- 1 no tool settles on its own
- 2 we would point at accessiBe
- Inclusify
You want the rule set named, and run against the page a browser renders
The full axe-core ruleset in headless Chrome. accessiBe describes AI checks without naming one.
- Inclusify
Your developers want findings in Slack, Jira, Claude or a CI gate
22 MCP tools over OAuth, a Slack app and a Jira export, all on the account's own scans.
- Inclusify
You need to show what was tested and what changed, with dates on it
A monthly record kept for 24 months, 30 days of day-by-day history on Pro, and a report you can download.
- Inclusify
You want to read the price and start before talking to anyone
Every plan price published, and a free plan with no card and no time limit.
- Neither
You want one script to take care of accessibility on its own
Nothing here does that, ours included. That is what the FTC's 2025 order was about.
- accessiBe
You need a manual audit, a prepared VPAT, or ADA attorney hours
accessiBe sells all three. Inclusify employs no auditors and sells no legal support.
- accessiBe
You are auditing thousands of pages across dozens of domains
accessFlow's tiers run past 10,000 pages and 100 domains. Our largest plan audits 100.
| Your situation | Better fit |
|---|---|
| You want the rule set named, and run against the page a browser renders | InclusifyThe full axe-core ruleset in headless Chrome. accessiBe describes AI checks without naming one. |
| Your developers want findings in Slack, Jira, Claude or a CI gate | Inclusify22 MCP tools over OAuth, a Slack app and a Jira export, all on the account's own scans. |
| You need to show what was tested and what changed, with dates on it | InclusifyA monthly record kept for 24 months, 30 days of day-by-day history on Pro, and a report you can download. |
| You want to read the price and start before talking to anyone | InclusifyEvery plan price published, and a free plan with no card and no time limit. |
| You want one script to take care of accessibility on its own | NeitherNothing here does that, ours included. That is what the FTC's 2025 order was about. |
| You need a manual audit, a prepared VPAT, or ADA attorney hours | accessiBeaccessiBe sells all three. Inclusify employs no auditors and sells no legal support. |
| You are auditing thousands of pages across dozens of domains | accessiBeaccessFlow's tiers run past 10,000 pages and 100 domains. Our largest plan audits 100. |
Inclusify vs accessiBe
- 4 Both document it
- 5 Only Inclusify
- 0 Only accessiBe
- 2 Partial on one side
Compiled from publicly available product documentation reviewed August 2026. Features and pricing change. Check both vendors before deciding.
Accessibility widget with visual and reading adjustments
Contrast, font size, spacing, cursor, reading aids and text to speech for visitors.
- Inclusify
- Included
- accessiBe
- Included
Preset profiles for common access needs
Both ship six presets covering vision, cognitive, seizure, keyboard and screen-reader use.
- Inclusify
- Included
- accessiBe
- Included
Automated WCAG 2.1 AA scanning
Issues detected and reported against the WCAG 2.1 AA success criteria.
- Inclusify
- Included
- accessiBe
- Included
MCP server for AI assistants
accessiBe documents an accessFlow MCP that connects an IDE agent to an existing issue by ID. Inclusify exposes 22 tools over OAuth, covering findings, history, live browser checks and a CI gate.
- Inclusify
- Included
- accessiBe
- Included
Named open-source rule engine
Inclusify runs the full axe-core ruleset in headless Chrome and says so. accessiBe describes AI-powered checks without naming a rule set.
- Inclusify
- Included
- accessiBe
- Not documented publicly
Screen-reader transcript from the live accessibility tree
The ordered announcements a screen reader would make, with role, name and state, plus a rotor view of headings, landmarks and links.
- Inclusify
- Included
- accessiBe
- Not documented publicly
Keyboard traversal with focus indicators measured from rendered pixels
A real Tab walk that reports focus traps, obscured focus naming the element on top, positive tabindex and tab order against DOM order.
- Inclusify
- Included
- accessiBe
- Not documented publicly
Verdict on a proposed fix before it ships
Inclusify judges the markup you are about to deploy and returns resolved, not resolved, masked or not decidable, so a change that only hides an issue is caught. accessFlow documents SDK validation run against local and staging environments.
- Inclusify
- Included
- accessiBe
- Staging SDK validation
Content clarity score for authored copy
An AI read of link text, button labels, heading context and alt-text quality, scored beside the axe result and deliberately kept out of it. accessFlow documents alt-text generation rather than scoring existing copy.
- Inclusify
- Included
- accessiBe
- Not documented publicly
Widget adjustments available without paying
All 35 Inclusify adjustments and all six profiles run on the free plan. accessiBe's published widget tiers start at $59 a month after a trial.
- Inclusify
- Free on every plan
- accessiBe
- Trial, then paid tiers
Published history retention for monitored pages
Inclusify keeps a dated monthly score record for 24 months on every monitored plan, plus 30 days of day-by-day history on Pro and above. accessFlow publishes a scan cadence per tier without stating how long the record is kept.
- Inclusify
- Included
- accessiBe
- Not documented publicly
What automated testing reaches, and what it does not
These shares are percentages of WCAG success criteria, not percentages of the issues on your page. The two get quoted as if they were the same number and they are not. Six evaluation tools benchmarked against WCAG 2.0 covered between 23% and 50% of the success criteria, and one criterion in two was not analysed by any tool at all.
A tool decides
23%
of WCAG success criteria
Criteria a scanner can pass or fail on its own, such as contrast ratios, missing alt attributes, unlabeled form controls and duplicate ids. 23% is the conservative end of the 23% to 50% range measured across the six tools.
A tool points, a person decides
27%
of WCAG success criteria
Criteria a tool reaches for some of the ways they can fail but not all, so it narrows the page down to candidates and a person makes the call. This is the rest of the covered half, up to the 50% ceiling the same benchmark measured.
Only a person can judge
50%
of WCAG success criteria
Criteria no tool analysed at all: whether alt text describes the image, whether focus order follows the visual order, whether an error message can be understood, whether a custom component behaves under a screen reader.
Including Inclusify
This is a limit of automated testing, not a gap in one vendor's product, and Inclusify sits inside it with everyone else. Our scanner runs axe-core in a real browser and it reaches the same kind of criteria the benchmark describes, which means the larger half of this chart is still work for a person and still needs changes in your code. We detect, report and track. Anything sold as covering the rest on its own is describing a product that does not exist yet.
Where these figures come from
- Vigo, Brown & Conway, Benchmarking web accessibility evaluation tools (W4A 2013): six tools covered 23% to 50% of WCAG 2.0 success criteria, and one criterion in two was not analysed at all Checked
- UK Government Digital Service, accessibility tools audit: 142 deliberately introduced barriers tested against automated tools, with results split between definite errors and findings a person has to verify Checked
- GDS accessibility blog, what we found when we tested tools on the world's least-accessible webpage: the best tool found 41% of the barriers and 29% were missed by every tool tested Checked
- Deque, automated testing identifies 57% of digital accessibility issues: a higher figure, measured as a share of issue volume across 13,000 pages rather than as a share of success criteria Checked
More than an overlay
Where Inclusify is the stronger choice.
Compared on this page
Widgets and overlays
- Acts on
- The visitor's browser, on top of the page your server already sent.
- Changes
- What that visitor sees and hears: text size and spacing, contrast, color filters, motion, reading aids and text to speech.
- Cannot do
- It cannot change the markup your developers ship, so the underlying page is unchanged for everyone who never opens it, and that is as true of Inclusify's widget as of any other.
Enterprise platforms
- Acts on
- Your roadmap, through audit hours, remediation help and an account team.
- Changes
- Which findings get prioritized and fixed, with people attached to the software rather than software alone.
- Cannot do
- The work is bounded by the hours in the contract, so coverage stops where the retainer stops.
Testing and monitoring platforms
- Acts on
- Your pages, crawled and tested on a schedule from outside the site.
- Changes
- Nothing on the site itself. It produces the list your developers work through.
- Cannot do
- It reports rather than repairs, so nothing improves for a visitor until someone ships the change.
Platform-native apps
- Acts on
- Your store, installed from the platform's own marketplace and billed through it.
- Changes
- Whatever the platform lets an app change, usually a theme embed and settings in the admin.
- Cannot do
- It is scoped to the one platform it is sold on, so it does not follow you to a site that marketplace does not cover.
A rule set you can read
The full axe-core ruleset, run in headless Chrome against the page a browser actually renders. It is open source, so what it tests is checkable.
Behaviour, not only rule counts
A real Tab walk that names focus traps and obscured focus, plus a screen-reader transcript taken from the live accessibility tree.
A verdict before you ship
Paste the markup you are about to deploy and get back resolved, not resolved, masked or not decidable. Masked is the one that earns its keep.
The copy your team wrote, scored
Link text, button labels, heading context and alt quality, reported beside the axe result. Rules pass a link called "click here"; this does not.
One plan, priced by pages
Widget, monitoring and the full-site crawl on the same plan. accessiBe prices the widget on traffic and sells accessFlow separately.
Being straight about it
What Inclusify does not do
Four things accessiBe does that we do not. If one of them is what you came for, better to read it here than to find out after installing.
Fixes applied in the visitor's browser
accessWidget rewrites ARIA, alt text and keyboard behaviour at page load. Inclusify only detects and reports, so every fix is work on your side.
Expert services we do not offer
Manual audits, prepared VPATs, a case manager and ADA attorney hours are real parts of accessiBe's line. Inclusify employs no auditors.
Scale we do not reach
accessFlow's tiers run from 1,000 pages and 2 domains to more than 10,000 pages across 100. Inclusify's largest plan audits 100 pages.
Platform features, and a track record
No white-label, no SSO, no public REST API. accessiBe has been selling since 2018, with the case studies and support organisation that follow.
What price actually buys
Both companies publish figures, which is unusual in this category. They are not the same shape.
- $0FreeWidget, 1,000 visitors
- $39Starter5 monitored pages
- $99Pro25 pages, crawl, AI review
- $279Enterprise100 monitored pages
Per website. Annual billing costs ten months. The free plan needs no card; paid plans start with a 7-day trial.
What accessiBe publishes
accessWidget's tiers start at $59 a month after a trial, sized by monthly page views, with the expert services on the higher tiers. accessFlow is priced separately by pages and domains, so running both means buying both.
Their pricing page, checkedHow to decide between Inclusify and accessiBe.
A change for visitors, or a record of the work?
An overlay changes today's page. An audit produces the list and the dated evidence. Different purchases.
Who is going to make the fixes?
If nobody on your side has time to change code, a tool that only reports improves nothing.
How many pages really need auditing?
Count templates, not URLs. Eight thousand products is usually a dozen templates.
Where does a finding have to land?
Jira, Slack, an agent, a release gate. A dashboard nobody opens is the same as no tool.
What survives the script being removed?
A correction at page load lasts as long as the script does. A fix in your markup outlives the vendor.
Switching questions.
Something here not answered? Talk to us.
Same table, other tools: Inclusify vs UserWay, Inclusify vs AudioEye, Inclusify vs EqualWeb.
It depends which half of the problem you are buying. accessiBe is the stronger pick if you want changes applied in the visitor's browser without editing the site, or if you need the manual audits, VPAT preparation and attorney hours their higher tiers carry. Inclusify is the stronger pick if you want the full axe-core ruleset run in a real browser, findings your developers can act on with the selector and template named, and a dated record of every scan. On the visitor-facing widget the two are close, and ours is free on every plan.
For the widget, yes: all 35 Inclusify adjustments and all six profiles run on the free plan, and accessWidget's published tiers start at $59 a month after a trial. For scanning it depends on size. Inclusify is $39 to $279 a month per website by audited pages, and accessFlow is priced separately by pages and domains, so a large estate can land either way. Compare the page allowance behind the price rather than the headline figure, and remember that running accessWidget and accessFlow means buying two products.
Inclusify ships a widget, so the visitor-facing part looks similar. The difference is what sits behind it. Inclusify does not rewrite your pages to make them pass a rule. It audits the rendered page with axe-core, reports what it found with the selector to change, and keeps a dated history so you can show the work.
You get an audit trail rather than an adjustment layer. Inclusify re-scans each monitored page roughly every twenty hours, emails you when a scan finds something new, and keeps a monthly record for twenty-four months. If you keep accessWidget for the visitor toolbar, nothing stops you running Inclusify's scanning beside it.
No, and that is deliberate. Inclusify detects and reports. Automated fixes applied in the browser can mask a problem from a scanner while leaving it in place for someone using a screen reader, and they disappear the moment the script does. We would rather tell you exactly what to change.
It is public record and worth knowing. The FTC announced a complaint in January 2025 and approved a final order in April 2025 requiring accessiBe to pay $1 million. The order bars the company from representing that its automated products can make a website WCAG compliant, or keep it compliant over time, without evidence to support the claim, and it also covers third-party articles and reviews presented as independent opinions. That is a claim about marketing, not a verdict on whether the widget helps your visitors. We mention it once because it sets the line we hold ourselves to: no scan, and no widget, makes a site compliant.
Three cases, and they are real. When nobody on your side is going to change the code, so automatic remediation in the browser is the only improvement that will actually happen. When you need a person: a manual audit, a professionally prepared VPAT, or the ADA attorney consultation attached to their higher widget tiers. And when the estate is large, because accessFlow's published tiers run past 10,000 pages and 100 domains while our largest plan audits 100 pages.
Free is $0 and covers the widget on one language for up to 1,000 monthly visitors. Starter is $39 a month and adds widget customization, all 71 languages, daily monitoring of 5 pages and email alerts when a scan finds something new. Pro is $99 a month and adds 25 monitored pages, the on-demand full-site crawl, the AI content review, downloadable compliance reports and 30 days of day-by-day history. Enterprise is $279 a month with 100 monitored pages. Pricing is per website, annual billing costs ten months instead of twelve, and every paid plan starts with a 7-day trial.
Very little, and none of it is used for tracking. The widget stores a visitor's own preferences in their browser and sets no cookies. The only request it makes is a one-pixel beacon used to count monthly visits, and the visitor's IP address is hashed before it is stored, so the raw address is never written to our database. The widget does not read, copy or transmit the content of your pages.
Scans run on Inclusify's own infrastructure in a real Chrome browser, so the page is tested as a visitor's browser renders it rather than as static HTML. We store the findings, not copies of your site: rule identifiers, the selectors and short snippets needed to locate each issue, and the score. On Pro and above the AI review sends targeted material to an AI provider, specifically images that are missing alt text and short label or heading strings, never a dump of your page or your customer data. Inclusify holds no accessibility certification and is not SOC 2 audited, and nothing here should be read as implying otherwise.
Any site where you can add one script tag. There is a native Shopify app with a theme app embed, so Shopify stores install it with a toggle and no code, and documented install steps for WordPress, Magento, BigCommerce, Webflow, Wix and Squarespace. The scanner works against any URL it can reach, and password-protected Shopify stores are handled rather than failed.
Add the Inclusify snippet or install the Shopify app, confirm the widget appears, then remove the other vendor's script. There is no importer, so settings and any dismissed findings do not carry over, and the pages you want monitored are nominated once in the panel. The free plan has no time limit, so you can run both side by side for as long as you want before removing anything.
Make your website accessible today.
Accessibility opens your site to millions more customers - and protects your business while you do it.