Inclusify vs AudioEye
See what is broken, and keep the record that you fixed it
AudioEye pairs automation with certified experts who write custom fixes, and a legal assurance behind it. Inclusify is the engineering side: real-browser audits, dated reports, findings your agents can query.
Published by Inclusify, one of the two products compared. How this comparison is built. Last checked August 2026.
Where Inclusify fits
Inclusify is the engineering side of this: audits, findings and a dated record, at a published price. Here is what that fits, and where AudioEye is the better call.
- 4 fit Inclusify
- 1 no tool settles on its own
- 2 we would point at AudioEye
- Inclusify
You want to read the price and start today
Their plans page routes every tier to a conversation. Every Inclusify price is published.
- Inclusify
You want the rule set named, and run against the page a browser renders
The full axe-core ruleset in headless Chrome, and it is open source, so what it tests is checkable.
- Inclusify
Your developers want findings in Slack, Jira or their own AI tools
22 MCP tools over OAuth on the account's own scans. Their developer tools document CSV export you upload yourself.
- Inclusify
You want per-page history with dates on it, not a report at review time
Re-scanned roughly every 20 hours, 30 days of daily history on Pro, 24 months of monthly record.
- Neither
You want one script to take care of accessibility on its own
Nothing here does that, ours included. Automated testing reaches part of WCAG 2.1 AA, not all of it.
- AudioEye
You want somebody else to write the fixes for your site
Their managed plan puts certified experts on what automation leaves. Inclusify has no equivalent.
- AudioEye
You need a certification, an expert audit, or a commercial assurance
AudioEye issues one for the pages it covers and sells Assurance. Inclusify signs nothing.
| Your situation | Better fit |
|---|---|
| You want to read the price and start today | InclusifyTheir plans page routes every tier to a conversation. Every Inclusify price is published. |
| You want the rule set named, and run against the page a browser renders | InclusifyThe full axe-core ruleset in headless Chrome, and it is open source, so what it tests is checkable. |
| Your developers want findings in Slack, Jira or their own AI tools | Inclusify22 MCP tools over OAuth on the account's own scans. Their developer tools document CSV export you upload yourself. |
| You want per-page history with dates on it, not a report at review time | InclusifyRe-scanned roughly every 20 hours, 30 days of daily history on Pro, 24 months of monthly record. |
| You want one script to take care of accessibility on its own | NeitherNothing here does that, ours included. Automated testing reaches part of WCAG 2.1 AA, not all of it. |
| You want somebody else to write the fixes for your site | AudioEyeTheir managed plan puts certified experts on what automation leaves. Inclusify has no equivalent. |
| You need a certification, an expert audit, or a commercial assurance | AudioEyeAudioEye issues one for the pages it covers and sells Assurance. Inclusify signs nothing. |
Inclusify vs AudioEye
- 4 Both document it
- 4 Only Inclusify
- 0 Only AudioEye
- 2 Partial on one side
Compiled from publicly available product documentation reviewed August 2026. Features and pricing change. Check both vendors before deciding.
Accessibility widget for site visitors
Visual and reading adjustments applied in the visitor's browser.
- Inclusify
- Included
- AudioEye
- Included
Automated WCAG 2.1 AA issue detection and reporting
- Inclusify
- Included
- AudioEye
- Included
Continuous monitoring of pages over time
Pages re-tested on a schedule rather than once at install.
- Inclusify
- Included
- AudioEye
- Included
MCP server for AI coding agents
Accessibility tooling callable from Claude, Cursor and similar clients.
- Inclusify
- Included
- AudioEye
- Included
AI agents can query the account's own stored findings and history
As distinct from a local testing SDK: the scans already recorded against your sites, their scores and how each page moved.
- Inclusify
- Included
- AudioEye
- Not documented publicly
Keyboard traversal run as part of every audit
Real Tab traversal that reports focus traps, obscured focus and tab order against DOM order, with the focus indicator measured from rendered pixels rather than read from CSS.
- Inclusify
- Included
- AudioEye
- Not documented publicly
Screen reader transcript for a whole page
The ordered announcements a screen reader would make, read from the live accessibility tree, plus a rotor view of headings, landmarks and links.
- Inclusify
- Included
- AudioEye
- Not documented publicly
Jira export that opens one ticket per problem pattern
Connected through Inclusify's own Atlassian app, so there are no API keys to paste and no spreadsheet in between.
- Inclusify
- Included
- AudioEye
- CSV export to upload yourself
Free plan with no time limit
Inclusify runs the widget and all 35 adjustments on a free plan up to 1,000 visitors a month, with no card.
- Inclusify
- Included
- AudioEye
- Not documented publicly
Prices published on the website
- Inclusify
- From $0, paid from $39 a month
- AudioEye
- Contact sales
What automated testing reaches, and what it does not
These shares are percentages of WCAG success criteria, not percentages of the issues on your page. The two get quoted as if they were the same number and they are not. Six evaluation tools benchmarked against WCAG 2.0 covered between 23% and 50% of the success criteria, and one criterion in two was not analysed by any tool at all.
A tool decides
23%
of WCAG success criteria
Criteria a scanner can pass or fail on its own, such as contrast ratios, missing alt attributes, unlabeled form controls and duplicate ids. 23% is the conservative end of the 23% to 50% range measured across the six tools.
A tool points, a person decides
27%
of WCAG success criteria
Criteria a tool reaches for some of the ways they can fail but not all, so it narrows the page down to candidates and a person makes the call. This is the rest of the covered half, up to the 50% ceiling the same benchmark measured.
Only a person can judge
50%
of WCAG success criteria
Criteria no tool analysed at all: whether alt text describes the image, whether focus order follows the visual order, whether an error message can be understood, whether a custom component behaves under a screen reader.
Including Inclusify
This is a limit of automated testing, not a gap in one vendor's product, and Inclusify sits inside it with everyone else. Our scanner runs axe-core in a real browser and it reaches the same kind of criteria the benchmark describes, which means the larger half of this chart is still work for a person and still needs changes in your code. We detect, report and track. Anything sold as covering the rest on its own is describing a product that does not exist yet.
Where these figures come from
- Vigo, Brown & Conway, Benchmarking web accessibility evaluation tools (W4A 2013): six tools covered 23% to 50% of WCAG 2.0 success criteria, and one criterion in two was not analysed at all Checked
- UK Government Digital Service, accessibility tools audit: 142 deliberately introduced barriers tested against automated tools, with results split between definite errors and findings a person has to verify Checked
- GDS accessibility blog, what we found when we tested tools on the world's least-accessible webpage: the best tool found 41% of the barriers and 29% were missed by every tool tested Checked
- Deque, automated testing identifies 57% of digital accessibility issues: a higher figure, measured as a share of issue volume across 13,000 pages rather than as a share of success criteria Checked
More than an overlay
Where Inclusify is the stronger choice.
Widgets and overlays
- Acts on
- The visitor's browser, on top of the page your server already sent.
- Changes
- What that visitor sees and hears: text size and spacing, contrast, color filters, motion, reading aids and text to speech.
- Cannot do
- It cannot change the markup your developers ship, so the underlying page is unchanged for everyone who never opens it, and that is as true of Inclusify's widget as of any other.
Compared on this page
Enterprise platforms
- Acts on
- Your roadmap, through audit hours, remediation help and an account team.
- Changes
- Which findings get prioritized and fixed, with people attached to the software rather than software alone.
- Cannot do
- The work is bounded by the hours in the contract, so coverage stops where the retainer stops.
Testing and monitoring platforms
- Acts on
- Your pages, crawled and tested on a schedule from outside the site.
- Changes
- Nothing on the site itself. It produces the list your developers work through.
- Cannot do
- It reports rather than repairs, so nothing improves for a visitor until someone ships the change.
Platform-native apps
- Acts on
- Your store, installed from the platform's own marketplace and billed through it.
- Changes
- Whatever the platform lets an app change, usually a theme embed and settings in the admin.
- Cannot do
- It is scoped to the one platform it is sold on, so it does not follow you to a site that marketplace does not cover.
A price you can read
Every Inclusify plan price is published, the free plan needs no card, and a paid plan starts with a trial. AudioEye routes all three tiers to a conversation.
A rule set you can read
The full axe-core ruleset in headless Chrome, against the page a browser actually renders. It is open source, so what it tests is checkable.
Findings your own tools can pull
22 MCP tools over OAuth expose the account's violations, history and crawl results. Their developer tools document CSV export you upload yourself.
Behaviour, not only rule counts
A real Tab walk that names focus traps and obscured focus, plus a screen-reader transcript taken from the live accessibility tree.
Every domain in one account
Multiple domains under one organisation, one set of findings, one bill, and a partner portal for agencies, priced by audited pages rather than by service tier.
Being straight about it
What Inclusify does not do
Four things AudioEye does that we do not. If one of them is what you came for, better to read it here than to find out after installing.
Human remediation, included
Automation reaches a limit on every site. Their managed plan puts certified experts, including testers who use assistive technology daily, on the rest. Inclusify has no equivalent.
Expert audits and a certification
AudioEye pairs automation with manual auditing and issues a certification for the pages it covers. Inclusify produces a dated scan record and nothing a specialist has signed.
A legal support offering
AudioEye Assurance is a commercial commitment on the pages they cover. Inclusify makes no promise of that kind and does not sell one.
Scale, volume and longevity
More than 129,000 customers, over 20 years in the market and a public listing, against our 100-page ceiling. That is a different kind of assurance from a feature table.
What price actually buys
Only one side of this comparison publishes a figure. The honest version of a pricing section is to say so.
- $0FreeWidget, 1,000 visitors
- $39Starter5 monitored pages
- $99Pro25 pages, crawl, AI review
- $279Enterprise100 monitored pages
Per website. Annual billing costs ten months. The free plan needs no card; paid plans start with a 7-day trial.
What AudioEye publishes
Three tiers, Basic, Self-Serviced and Managed, and no monthly or annual figure published for any of them: one routes to a sign-up, the other two to a conversation. Third-party listings quote numbers and we are not going to repeat them. Ask what the remediation hours cover.
Their pricing page, checkedHow to decide between Inclusify and AudioEye.
Software, or software with people attached?
Their proposition is automation plus experts plus an assurance. Ours is a tool. Work out which one you are short of.
Who is going to make the fixes?
This decides it. If the answer is nobody, a reporting tool changes nothing and their managed plan is the realistic route.
Do you need something signed?
They issue a certification for the pages they cover. We produce the dated evidence underneath one, not the statement.
How many pages really need auditing?
Count templates, not URLs. If the answer is still in the thousands, our 100-page ceiling is the wrong shape.
What happens between engagements?
A managed engagement fixes what exists today, and the site changes every week. Ask who hears about a regression.
Switching questions.
Something here not answered? Talk to us.
Same table, other tools: Inclusify vs accessiBe, Inclusify vs UserWay, Inclusify vs EqualWeb.
They are not really the same purchase. AudioEye is the stronger pick if you want certified experts writing custom fixes, an expert audit and certification, a commercial assurance offering, or coverage of an estate running to thousands of pages. Inclusify is the stronger pick if you want a published price and a free plan, the full axe-core ruleset run in a real browser, keyboard and screen-reader behaviour tested rather than only rules counted, and findings your developers can pull into Slack, Jira and their AI tools. Plenty of teams would sensibly run one after the other rather than choose.
We cannot claim that, because AudioEye publishes no price. Their plans page lists three tiers and routes them to a conversation, and quoting a figure from a review site would not be their price list. What we can state is ours: $0 on the free plan, then $39, $99 and $279 a month per website by audited pages, with the widget, the scanner and the crawl on the same plan. Compare that against whatever they quote you, and count the remediation hours in their number.
Engineering visibility. Inclusify audits your pages in a real browser, keeps issue history per page, and exposes findings to Slack, Jira and AI agents through the MCP server so your developers can work on them directly. It does not replace the remediation work AudioEye does for you.
Yes, and we say so in the table. AudioEye publishes a testing SDK as an MCP server for developers to run against a page they are building. Inclusify's MCP server answers questions about the scans already recorded on your account, which is a different job.
Less than that, deliberately. Inclusify does not present itself as fixing issues automatically. It detects and reports them against WCAG 2.1 AA, suggests fixes for the rules where a suggestion is safe to make, and records what changed between scans so the work can be tracked.
No, and neither can any automated product on its own. Inclusify detects and reports WCAG 2.1 AA issues, tracks them per page over time, and gives you dated documentation of that work. Fixing them is a decision your team makes.
When the work needs a person or a signature. Certified manual auditing, custom remediation written for your site, a certification covering the pages they are engaged on, or the AudioEye Assurance commitment. Also when the estate is large: our plans top out at 100 audited pages. And when nobody on your side is going to act on a report, because then a tool that only detects and reports will not move anything.
Free is $0 and covers the widget on one language for up to 1,000 monthly visitors. Starter is $39 a month and adds widget customization, all 71 languages, daily monitoring of 5 pages and email alerts when a scan finds something new. Pro is $99 a month and adds 25 monitored pages, the on-demand full-site crawl, the AI content review, downloadable compliance reports and 30 days of day-by-day history. Enterprise is $279 a month with 100 monitored pages. Pricing is per website, annual billing costs ten months instead of twelve, and every paid plan starts with a 7-day trial.
Very little, and none of it is used for tracking. The widget stores a visitor's own preferences in their browser and sets no cookies. The only request it makes is a one-pixel beacon used to count monthly visits, and the visitor's IP address is hashed before it is stored, so the raw address is never written to our database. The widget does not read, copy or transmit the content of your pages.
Scans run on Inclusify's own infrastructure in a real Chrome browser, so the page is tested as a visitor's browser renders it rather than as static HTML. We store the findings, not copies of your site: rule identifiers, the selectors and short snippets needed to locate each issue, and the score. On Pro and above the AI review sends targeted material to an AI provider, specifically images that are missing alt text and short label or heading strings, never a dump of your page or your customer data. Inclusify holds no accessibility certification and is not SOC 2 audited, and nothing here should be read as implying otherwise.
Any site where you can add one script tag. There is a native Shopify app with a theme app embed, so Shopify stores install it with a toggle and no code, and documented install steps for WordPress, Magento, BigCommerce, Webflow, Wix and Squarespace. The scanner works against any URL it can reach, and password-protected Shopify stores are handled rather than failed.
Add the Inclusify snippet or install the Shopify app, confirm the widget appears, then remove the other vendor's script. There is no importer, so settings and any dismissed findings do not carry over, and the pages you want monitored are nominated once in the panel. The free plan has no time limit, so you can run both side by side for as long as you want before removing anything.
Make your website accessible today.
Accessibility opens your site to millions more customers - and protects your business while you do it.